Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 26.06.2025 16:51

Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Two different time scales could increase quantum clock accuracy exponentially - Phys.org
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
Reddit user surprised when 1960s computer panel emerged from collapsed family garage - Ars Technica
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Milky Way has 50-50 chance of colliding with neighbor galaxy - NewsNation
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
How do legitimate BPO companies find and secure clients without using social media?
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Thank you.
What’s next?
How does a new KDP writer supposed to market a book?
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Trump Crypto Wallet Goes Dark Following Cease and Desist - Decrypt
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Amid tariff drama, good economic news can't catch a break - Axios
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Let’s just make it real clear: